Author: mharvey5

3 places where I used coordination correctly:

1. The liberal arts style of education is one that is more focused on the growth of knowledge for a student and less on the career aspect for their futures.
2. Here each student has a major that they are taking a majority of classes in but there is a required curriculum and handbook so that their students still get the liberal arts education, while being career oriented as well.
3. STEM, by some liberal arts advocates, is not considered part of the education system of the liberal arts but Sanford Ungar believes that a liberal arts background is going to help students applying in the STEM field. 

2 places where I used subordination correctly:

1. While students here do have a major, they also are required to take classes that are part of the Core Curriculum to give them a broader perspective and understanding of the materials they are learning. 
2. While a liberal arts is considered to be solely humanities based, there are also some colleges that include the natural sciences as part of their curriculum.

For the coordination conjunctions I actually found them all in my working draft and I think they all are compound sentences that compare two things, whether it be works from the authors or my ideas. I usually do a pretty good job bringing in compound sentences into my writing so I knew I would have them in my essay. While for the subordination sentences I only had the first one in my essay. These are a bit harder for me but I think that the first one that I had worked really well. I talked about students having a major but also have classes that pertain to the liberal arts ideas which works really well with the setup of the subordination sentences. The second sentence I wrote myself for this assignment but I think it will definitely work in my essay.

Original Introduction: The liberal arts are a type of education system that is based on a generalized curriculum, not strictly career based, and has these four big components: natural sciences, social science, fine arts and humanities. With this style of education, students are going to be immersed in classes that are going to be giving them valuable knowledge and skills that will be beneficial for their futures. There are many people that do argue that this idea of a liberal arts education is not going to take you anywhere in life authors Jeffrey Scheuer and Sanford Ungar have debunked this theory.  A liberal arts education is going to give you critical thinking skills and a deeper understanding of knowledge that you won’t get, as in depth, anywhere else.

Revised Introduction: The liberal arts are a type of education system that is based on a generalized curriculum, not strictly career based, and can consist of these four big components: natural sciences, social science, fine arts and humanities. With this style of education, students are going to be immersed in classes that are going to be giving them valuable knowledge and skills that will be beneficial for their futures. These students will be seeing a broader spectrum of knowledge and ideas by immersing themselves in a wider range of education. “The Critical Thinking and the Liberal Arts” written by Jeffrey Scheuer, an activist for a liberal arts education, discusses the positives of this style of education and how it will be beneficial for the future of students. While in “7 Major Misconceptions About the Liberal Arts” by Sanford Ungar, another activist for the ideas of an liberal arts education, talks about the misconceptions that follow a liberal arts education and debunks these theories and showing his readers that this style of education can be more beneficial to students than a career based education. While many people argue that a liberal arts education isn’t going to get you a career and will only get you debt, both Scheuer and Ungar contradict these theories. And in the end, students are going to be more well off by following this education style and seeing the knowledge side of education. A liberal arts education is going to give you critical thinking skills and a deeper understanding of knowledge that you won’t get, as in depth, anywhere else. 

The changes I made to my original introduction were made to give more detail of the texts that we work with. Before i did not have any real introduction of the texts i used and just placed them in the essay without giving any background information on them. I also expanded my personal perspective at the end of the introduction to really show how I feel about these articles and what my paper is going to be about. 

The liberal arts style of education is one that is more focused on the growth of knowledge for a student and less on the career aspect for their futures. To some it seems like this style of education is going to be harmful for students in the future but in reality it is quite the opposite. In a study by Sanford Ungar, he shows his readers how a liberal arts education is going to benefit students in the search for jobs in the future, “An astounding 89 percent said they were looking for more emphasis on “the ability to effectively communicate orally and in writing,” and almost as many urged the development of better “critical thinking and analytical reasoning skills.” Seventy percent said they were on the lookout for “the ability to innovate and be creative.’” He is showing his readers that this style of education is changing the game for the job market and future employers. They want someone who is going to be able to have communication and critical thinking, which is highly developed in students who go to a liberal arts college. Why this type of education creates these more critical thinkers is due to the fact that they don’t focus solely on career oriented classes. They branch out and have their students take political science,  literature, philosophy, sociology, and many other classes that force a deeper level of thinking and understanding onto the students. And this idea that the liberal arts is going to create more jobs and opportunities for students isn’t just thought up by Ungar. Jonathan Scheuer also agrees with the idea that a liberal arts education is going to open up the field of jobs that students can apply to. “The liberal arts ideal still has its eloquent defenders, and there is evidence that good jobs go to liberal arts graduates” is Scheuer’s idea that liberal arts does not stop young people from getting jobs. But what the liberal arts does is open up a level of thinking that is going to be beneficial for students in many years to come. When they start on this journey in the liberal arts, they are always going to be growing their knowledge and understanding of the field they are in.

Here at the University of New England we pride ourselves in being a liberal arts school that is very open to showing their students different topics and ideas to learn about. While students here do have a major, they also are required to take classes that are part of the Core Curriculum, Gen Ed classes, to give us a broader perspective and understanding of the materials we are learning. “Through the Core Curriculum, students will develop foundational knowledge and critical thinking skills that are necessary for understanding and assuming their roles in natural, social, humanistic, and other environments. The goals of this shared academic experience, as described below, are informed by several core values” is what the handbook describes the core curriculum to be and why it is in place. It is made to create students who are better at critical thinking and understanding information, which is going to help them with their jobs in the future. Not only does the handbook say that this curriculum promotes this higher level of thinking but  also “As a whole, the Core Curriculum integrates these values in order to provide students with essential preparation for responsible caring for the wellbeing of individuals, civil societies, and our shared planet. Completing Core requirements provides a common learning experience through which students demonstrate application, synthesis, and integration of knowledge and skills central to a liberal arts education.” UNE wants their students to be able to think critically and truly demonstrate their knowledge. And this idea that UNE is something that many other people are striving for. Jonathan Scheuer, an author and liberal arts advocate, believes that being able to do a certain job and be specialized in a single field is not the most important thing in life. “But we all need to be well-informed, critical citizens. And the liberal arts prepare students for citizenship in all three senses—civic, economic, and cultural” is how Scheuer sees the liberal arts. He thinks that well rounded and critical thinking citizens are what is important in our society. When you are able to better understand your surroundings and what is going on around you, he believes that these students are going to be what creates a better society for ourselves. With Scheuer’s idea of these people and their ways of critical thinking, you can see that these types of students are what most schools are trying to obtain. And UNE’s model is trying to create these types of citizens, and students, that Scheuer talks about. 

The objective of this curriculum that UNE has created is “Living in the interconnected world today demands an understanding of a variety of cultures, people and the environment. This understanding requires an ability to analyze issues from different points of view and to communicate effectively. Students must also be prepared to enter the world engaged as local, national and global citizens and professionals.” They want to be able to have students who are able to thrive in a society that doesn’t always see the deeper level of understanding. Creating these students and enhancing their critical thinking abilities is what is going to set them apart from others for the rest of their lives. This broader, focusing not only on career based classes, and more in depth education is going to help us in any field we step into in the future, and that is including STEM. STEM, by some liberal arts advocates, is not considered part of the education system of the liberal arts but Sanford Ungar believes that a liberal arts background is going to help students applying in the STEM field. “To be sure, there is much concern about whether America is keeping up with China and other rising economies in the STEM disciplines. No evidence suggests, however, that success in scientific and technical fields will be greater if it comes at the expense of a broad background in other areas of the liberal arts” is Ungar’s opinion on STEM and its connection to the liberal arts. This background in communication, writing and comprehension that liberal arts gives students is what STEM fields need. They need someone who can look at a problem in a different perspective and figure it out in ways that others cannot. UNE is doing a good job trying to give this solid background to its students so that no matter where they end up in the future they are going to have these liberal arts skills in their back pocket that they can pull out and use whenever they need to. 

Question 1: There was not much difference that I saw between the Core Handbook and Ungar/Scheuer’s ideas. The ideas of these authors is that a liberal arts education is going to create a more well-rounded and intellectual individual who is better at oral and written presentations. And the UNE Core Handbook wants to create an environment that is going to give students a better chance at being successful and giving them knowledge that will be key for their future, meaning the way they use their words verbally or through written works. UNE wants to create a type of student that Ungar and Scheuer believe are going to be the most successful and the ones running our societies someday, because these students are going to have an advantage in the job market and workplace due to the fact that they got a liberal arts education. There is one difference that I spotted between the Handbook and Ungar and Scheuer, which is science and where it stands in a liberal arts education. Scheuer believes that science, and STEM, are not supposed to be a part of this education style and that while they are important, they are just not what should be included in this education style. While ungar believes that the liberla arts are going to create a better science student. That this background in the liberl arts, while focusing more on the science based academics, will create better employment opportunities for those students. When trying to find a job in the STEM field, this background in the humanities and communication is going to set them apart. And in the UNE Handbook, science is recommended each semester. It is a staple part of this liberl arts education that we are getting. The students here at UNE are going to be getting science related topics to learn about, while still having a more liberla arts based education. 

Question 2: The two classes I talked about in the 2/26 homework were my english class and chemistry class. My chemistry class fits into the laboratory science section and my english class fits in the english section or the humanities section. Ungar believes that a background in the liberla arts, or humanities, is going to create a more well rounded student and with UNE’s handbook, I am going to become that student. With my english class and future humanities classes I am going to take, it is giving me a better foundation for my current chemistry class and future chemistry classes. This diverse background for myself is going to make me be able to do a better job conceptually understanding my chemistry and science classes, and like Ungar said, set me apart from other students. 

Question 4: In the UNE Core Handbook it talks about Critical Thinking, which is a big part of Scheuer’s ideas of the liberal arts and its education style. The Handbook states, “In short, the third year core requirements invite students to accomplish the difficult tasks of integrating disciplines and applying knowledge of the core and core theme to their majors. In particular, students will be challenged to define complex problems in their major and solve them, taking into account a variety of approaches and awareness, deciding what they need to know and how to get to know it, and learning to collaborate with others” showing that critical thinking is going to become a type of thinking that is going to be developed and truly worked on during out third year here at UNE. which is something that many schools probably do not have. The students at UNE are going to be spending an entire year learning and creating this type of thinking for themselves. When critical thinking is applied like this as a core part of a student curriculum, you are going to be creating students that are going to be understanding this type of thinking and are going to be the ones who can easily access this higher level thinking. Scheuer states that, “Critical thinking is the intellectual engine of a functional democracy: the set of mental practices that lends breadth, depth, clarity, and consistency to public discourse” and this is what UNE is saying they are going to be teaching to their students. This mental practice that Scheuer talks about is going to be ingrained in our brains, making us better thinkers 

UNE’s model for a liberal arts is for their students to develop a foundational knowledge and critical thinking skills that are necessary for the students future. The handbook talks about instilling “fluency, creativity, and imagination in thought and expression” in the students. With these goals, the university then creates a curriculum that will hit the students necessary needs for their major, but also give them the tools to develop this type of knowledge and critical thinking skills stated earlier in the handbook. The whole point of the Core Curriculum in UNE’s handbook is to integrate these values to create a well prepared student who is responsible for caring for themselves and others. UNE believes that they can achieve these goals that they have set for the students through the liberal arts education model, which Ungar is a big advocate for. Ungar believes that “An astounding 89 percent said they were looking for more emphasis on “the ability to effectively communicate orally and in writing,” and almost as many urged the development of better “critical thinking and analytical reasoning skills.” Seventy percent said they were on the lookout for “the ability to innovate and be creative.’” which is what UNE is trying to create. Students who are able to communicate both verbally and in writing, and the best way to create this well-rounded type of student would be the liberal arts model. With this model UNE is going to be creating better, more well rounded students that are going to be top choice when it comes to the job market. This type of education is a game changer for many students and without knowing it, they are going to be getting the best education possible. 

Looking at my classes from this semester and the fall semester, I can see from the handbook where they all fit in the curriculum. My english class fits into both the english section and the humanities explorations course, both my chemistry and biology classes fit into the laboratory science classes, my introduction to environmental issues class last semester fits right in as the key piece of my first year, and both of my calculus classes fit into the math section. Everything has a place in the curriculum. We are asked to see if there are a few classes that don’t fit the model of this liberal arts curriculum but all of my classes fit. The only thing that seems off to me is that I don’t have a specified explorations course. This english class could count toward it but then i would have to take english again, I think the fact that i am taking two science classes with labs is what is creating the issue for me. What I do think is hard, for my major especially, is that I am going to get less of the humanities classes and ideas that the liberal arts education wants because I am focused on the sciences. But the handbook does show me that those classes pertaining to the liberal arts ideas will be there someday, it is just I have to get to them first. Besides missing those few pieces of the liberal arts education, I think that all my classes lineup with the curriculum and my classes for future semesters are lining up as well, which makes me happy to know that I am going to have a great grasps and knowledge in not only the liberal arts but also in the sciences. 

Download this to see the PDF version of my table!

The Misconceptions:

The liberal arts is a type of education that many people talk about. There are reasons that it is a good education for students but there are also people who argue what truly the liberal arts are. There are 7 common misconceptions that are brought up when someone talks about the liberal arts education, and while these points are valid they are easily dismissed with the facts of what this type of education truly entails. People believe that this style of education is too expensive, only for the rich families, is based upon the beliefs of a certain political party and much more. But once you have a true look at what the education stands for you will see that this type of education may put you at an advantage when it comes to future employers. You are going to be developing skills that others are not, and that’s all thanks to the liberal arts education. We need to help people see what it truly is and what it truly means before we jump to the conclusions and misconceptions about this type of education.

Ungar’s Response:

Sanford Ungar wrote a paper called, “7 Major Misconceptions About the Liberal Arts” which discusses the 7 biggest misconceptions of this education style and debunks them all and shows what it is truly about. Ungar is an activist for this type of education, he believes that this type of education is going to give you many intellectual advantages over your peers and a leg up in the job market. Ungar believes that with the help of a liberal arts education you are going to go farther in life, no matter if you are from a low-income family or a first-generation college student. This education and knowledge is going to help you greatly when you truly enter the real world and start to see the type of well-rounded citizen you need to be.

Pre-Reading:

The title of this text is “Critical Thinking and the Liberal Arts”, meaning that the author is going to be discussing critical thinking and how it applies to the liberal arts. The author is going to be explaining to us what critical thinking is and how you use it. And they are also going to be explaining and helping us understand what Liberal Arts are. I believe that liberal arts is a type of curriculum taught to students that encompasses history, sciences, and literature. 

Section 1: What Are The Liberal Arts?

The Liberal Arts are a type of education. It is an integrated curriculum that brings together all nonprofessional higher learning. It is a higher level of thinking that doesn’t rely on a “normal” education, it brings in pieces from real world experiences that will create a more well rounded individual. “But however we define the liberal arts, no unique approach and no single method, text, or institution perfectly exemplifies the idea” is how the author describes the teaching of the liberal arts, there are many different variations of the liberal arts and how they can be presented in the classroom. 

Section 2: Why Do We Need The Liberal Arts?

The liberal arts are a big part of democracy, and is what helps keep democracy going. There are three levels of the citizenship that the liberal arts cover, civic dimension, economic citizenship, and cultural citizenship. These three levels are just the stepping stones of democracy but they are heavily influenced by the liberal arts and what they stand for. “But we all need to be well-informed, critical citizens. And the liberal arts prepare students for citizenship in all three senses—civic, economic, and cultural”, as the author is saying here, we need well-informed citizens and it is the liberal arts duty to show people what it means to be a well rounded and educated citizen. 

Section 3: What Is Critical Thinking?

“Critical thinking is the intellectual engine of a functional democracy: the set of mental practices that lends breadth, depth, clarity, and consistency to public discourse. It’s what makes thinking in public truly public and shareable” is how the author would describe critical thinking. It is taking the ideas discussed earlier about liberal arts and actually applying them. Critical thinking is part of the same umbrella that contains the liberal arts but it is a bit deeper, there is more that goes into thinking critically. It is creating independent ideas about a topic and trying to truly understand it, by drawing connections to other ideas and pulling in outside perspectives to understand what you are talking about and presenting to someone. 

Section 4: The Importance of Critical Inquiry

Critical Inquiry has more to do with than philosophy, it has no rules and creates an openness between people. It is meant to create and stir up conversations between people that can take a deep turn. It is meant to reflect your knowledge and understanding of important ideas. “The college-level progression toward more sophisticated reasoning isn’t just a matter of analytic thinking as a formal process. It is also reflected in certain organizing concepts that (like critical inquiry itself) transcend the various disciplines and unify the liberal arts curriculum” showing here that there are many ways to think at this deeper level to create more understand for yourself and for others.

Today I met with Olivia. We had a great conversation about the class itself and how I was doing. She hasn’t spent much time in our class yet this semester, so we took the beginning of our meeting just checking in on how I was doing and feeling in this class. We then talked about my essay and my concerns about it. I truly only had one question about my essay and I feel like we solved it. In my meeting with Prof. Cripps on Monday, he gave me suggestions and ideas on how to condense my first two body paragraphs about the authors. I did that for my homework yesterday but I felt as if the way I arranged them together seemed a bit choppy and as if I was trying too hard to get these pieces to fit. Olivia had me read her my new paragraph and she agreed that it was a bit choppy, that I did have a good idea and execution on adding them together but something was missing. We did a bit of brainstorming until she helped me come up with the perfect way to tie the authors ideas together. I am very happy with how the meeting went and how we were able to create this change, even if it was small, in my paper that is going to help show my ideas and position on the texts.

Ellipses: “First of all, we can praise wisely, not praising intelligence or talent. That has failed…. But praising the process that kids engage in, their effort, their strategies, their focus, their perseverance, their improvement. This process of praise creates kids who are hardy and resilient.” 

Brackets: “And universities will have reinforced the belief that it’s okay to filter out the positive. If students graduate believing that they can learn nothing from people they dislike or from those with whom they disagree, we [educators] will have done them a great intellectual disservice.”

Signal Phrasing:

Original: “Attempts to shield students from words, ideas, and people that might cause them emotional discomfort are bad for the students. They are bad for the workplace, which will be mired in unending litigation if student expectations of safety are carried forward.”

Revised: When these college students are continuously hiding from the hard conversations that are very present in the real world, they may be considered not fit to be a part of society. And this is very evident when Lukianoff and Haidt say, “Attempts to shield students from words, ideas, and people that might cause them emotional discomfort are bad for the students. They are bad for the workplace, which will be mired in unending litigation if student expectations of safety are carried forward.” 

Original: “Let’s not waste any more lives, because once we know that abilities are capable of such growth, it becomes a basic human right for children, all children, to live in places that create that growth, to live in places filled with “yet.’”

Revised: If we don’t try and create this change with these students, we are going to see that their full educational potential has been wasted. “Let’s not waste any more lives, because once we know that abilities are capable of such growth, it becomes a basic human right for children, all children, to live in places that create that growth, to live in places filled with “yet.’”

In-text citation:

“First of all, we can praise wisely, not praising intelligence or talent. That has failed. Don’t do that anymore. But praising the process that kids engage in, their effort, their strategies, their focus, their perseverance, their improvement. This process of praise creates kids who are hardy and resilient” (Dweck, Around 04:00).

“And universities will have reinforced the belief that it’s okay to filter out the positive. If students graduate believing that they can learn nothing from people they dislike or from those with whom they disagree, we will have done them a great intellectual disservice” (Lukianoff/Haidt, Paragraph 57).

“Attempts to shield students from words, ideas, and people that might cause them emotional discomfort are bad for the students. They are bad for the workplace, which will be mired in unending litigation if student expectations of safety are carried forward” (“The Coddling”, Paragraph 58)

“Let’s not waste any more lives, because once we know that abilities are capable of such growth, it becomes a basic human right for children, all children, to live in places that create that growth, to live in places filled with “yet’” (around 09:32).

Long Quote:

When Dweck gave this children a task here is what she observed: “I wanted to see how children coped with challenge and difficulty, so I gave 10-year-olds problems that were slightly too hard for them. Some of them reacted in a shockingly positive way. They said things like, “I love a challenge,” or, “You know, I was hoping this would be informative.” They understood that their abilities could be developed. They had what I call a growth mindset. But other students felt it was tragic, catastrophic. From their more fixed mindset perspective, their intelligence had been up for judgment, and they failed. Instead of luxuriating in the power of yet, they were gripped in the tyranny of now” (Around 00:35). When she gives this challenge to the students she sees the difference in the mindsets and how the fixed mindset student truly struggles with how to solve the problems. 

Here I just picked a longer quote from Dweck that shows the difference between the two mindsets and then included a citation at the end.

Original: In both Dweck’s TED Talk and in Lukianoff and Haidt’s article they talk about the issue of not being able to handle hard conversations and problems that are common in life. In Dweck’s Talk she talks about what goes through a person’s head when they are faced with a problem and  they have a fixed-mindset. When she is showing the audience the difference in the two types of mindsets, she says “On the left, you see the fixed-mindset students. There’s hardly any activity. They run from the error. They don’t engage with it” (around 01:51). What she is saying here is that students with this type of mindset don’t engage with a problem, she is showing real evidence taken from scientists and showing exactly what the difference is between the two students. They do not see the issue as a puzzle and aren’t trying to solve it. They are stuck in their ways and are not able to get past what they think they know. Similarly in Lukianoff and Haidt’s article they talk about people being very sheltered and not having hard conversations about things that are important in our lives. Lukianoff and Hadit talk about the hard conversations that we need to have in our life, about topics that are sensitive but also very crucial to parts of our history. “Attempts to shield students from words, ideas, and people that might cause them emotional discomfort are bad for the students. They are bad for the workplace, which will be mired in unending litigation if student expectations of safety are carried forward” (Paragraph 58) this is a quote from the text, and they are talking about how these people are not the kind of people that society wants. They want someone who will see a problem and effectively address the issue and find ways toward a solution. The people that can have these hard conversations and are able to keep themselves composed, even if they don’t like the way the conversation is going and not say that this is triggering them, are the ones that are going to go far in life. Because these people can see past their own selfishness and be able to be a contributing member of society. In both the TED Talk and “The Coddling” article, we see examples of students who have a fixed mindset. These students do not take the time to think outside of the box, and stop and realize that they are not the only ones who live in this world. Because this mindset  that they have immersed themselves in is going to create more issues for them in the future if they don’t try and grow their knowledge. 

Revised: We get stuck in this repeating cycle of running away. Everyone is guilty of this pattern when faced with difficulty, we just tend to run away when it gets hard. And if we can’t handle these hard things we just collapse, which will lead to nothing ever changing. It’s a mindset that we believe we have no control over, but actually we do. In Dweck’s Talk she talks about what goes through a person’s head when they are faced with a problem and they have a fixed-mindset. When she is showing the audience the difference in the two types of mindsets, she says “On the left, you see the fixed-mindset students. There’s hardly any activity. They run from the error. They don’t engage with it” (around 01:51). What she is saying here is that students with this type of mindset don’t engage with a problem, she is showing real evidence taken from scientists and showing exactly what the difference is between the two students. They do not see the issue as a puzzle and aren’t trying to solve it. They are stuck in their ways and are not able to get past what they think they know, they just continue to run away from the issues at hand. Similarly in Lukianoff and Haidt’s article, they talk about people being very sheltered and not having hard conversations about things that are important in our lives. Lukianoff and Hadit talk about the hard conversations that we need to have in our life, about topics that are sensitive but also very crucial to parts of our history. “Attempts to shield students from words, ideas, and people that might cause them emotional discomfort are bad for the students. They are bad for the workplace, which will be mired in unending litigation if student expectations of safety are carried forward” (Paragraph 58) this is a quote from the text, and it is  talking about how these people, the ones that run away from the problem, are not the kind of people that society wants. They want someone who will see a problem and effectively address the issue and find ways toward a solution. The people that can have these hard conversations and are able to keep themselves composed, even if they don’t like the way the conversation is going and not say that this is triggering them, are the ones that are going to go far in life. Because these people can see past their own selfishness and be able to be a contributing member of society. In both the TED Talk and “The Coddling” article, we see examples of students who have a fixed mindset. These students do not take the time to think outside of the box, and stop and realize that they are not the only ones who live in this world. Because this mindset that they have immersed themselves in is going to create more issues for them in the future if they don’t try and grow their knowledge, and stop running from the difficulties that life throws at us. 

Original: Carol Dweck is a researcher taking the idea of expanding knowledge to a new level. She believes in two different types of mindsets in students: a Fixed Mindset and a Growth Mindset. A Fixed Mindset is when you are faced with a problem you run away from it and are unable to solve it. These are students who do not understand a way to think at a deeper and higher level. While a Growth Mindset is a student who when you are faced with the same problem see a way to solve the problem. They think at a different level and see the problem as a puzzle to solve. Dweck did research on it and showed her audience during her TED Talk, “I wanted to see how children coped with challenge and difficulty, so I gave 10-year-olds problems that were slightly too hard for them. Some of them reacted in a shockingly positive way. They said things like, “I love a challenge,” or, “You know, I was hoping this would be informative.” They understood that their abilities could be developed. They had what I call a growth mindset. But other students felt it was tragic, catastrophic. From their more fixed mindset perspective, their intelligence had been up for judgment, and they failed. Instead of luxuriating in the power of yet, they were gripped in the tyranny of now” (Around 00:35). She is showing her audience what happens to the students when she approaches them with an issue. She notes that the fixed mindset students were upset with the challenge and felt as if they had failed but the ones that she believed had a growth mindset or could develop that mindset were very happy with the challenge and accepted it with a new way of thinking.The idea of her TED Talk is to show the difference and then give ways to see the change in the fixed mindset students and have them become a student with a growth mindset. She wants educators to find ways to engage with all the students and encourage this higher level of thinking. Dweck says “First of all, we can praise wisely, not praising intelligence or talent. That has failed. Don’t do that anymore. But praising the process that kids engage in, their effort, their strategies, their focus, their perseverance, their improvement. This process of praise creates kids who are hardy and resilient” (Around 04:00), which is a way for educators to encourage this type of thinking. She wants the education system to create students who are able to think outside the box and have a more creative way to solve problems they are faced with. 

Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt are authors of The Atlantic article called “The Coddling”, which has to do with the coddling of the education system and creating a sheltered environment for students. Their beliefs are that students are being sheltered from what is happening in the outside world due to trigger warnings in colleges. They explain them as, “Trigger warnings are alerts that professors are expected to issue if something in a course might cause a strong emotional response” (Paragraph 2) which is just the first steps in creating this sheltered and censored environment. Lukianoff and Haidt believe that the environment that colleges, and most of the education system in general, are creating is becoming harmful to the student and their future in the society. “Classroom discussions are safe places to be exposed to incidental reminders of trauma (such as the word violate). A discussion of violence is unlikely to be followed by actual violence, so it is a good way to help students change the associations that are causing them discomfort. And they’d better get their habituation done in college, because the world beyond college will be far less willing to accommodate requests for trigger warnings and opt-outs” (Paragraph 38) is a quote directly from their text showing that they believe that classrooms should be a safe place to have discussions and prepare students for the types of conversations they will hear and or face in the real world. Lukianoff and Haidt want students to be able to be safe while still talking about things that matter.

Revised: Carol Dweck is an education researcher taking the idea of expanding knowledge to a new level. She believes in two different types of mindsets in students: a Fixed Mindset and a Growth Mindset. A Fixed Mindset is when you are faced with a problem you run away from it and are unable to solve it. These are students who do not understand a way to think at a deeper and higher level. While a Growth Mindset is a student who when you are faced with the same problem see a way to solve the problem. They think at a different level and see the problem as a puzzle to solve. The idea of her TED Talk is to show the difference between these mindsets and then give ways to see the change in the fixed mindset students and have them start to gain a growth mindset. She wants educators to find ways to engage with all the students and encourage this higher level of thinking. She wants the education system to create students who are able to think outside the box and have a more creative way to solve problems they are faced with. Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt are authors of The Atlantic article called “The Coddling”, which has to do with the coddling of the education system and creating a sheltered environment for students. Their beliefs are that students are being sheltered from what is happening in the outside world due to trigger warnings in colleges. They explain them as, “Trigger warnings are alerts that professors are expected to issue if something in a course might cause a strong emotional response” (Paragraph 2) which is just the first steps in creating this sheltered and censored environment. Lukianoff and Haidt believe that the environment that colleges, and most of the education system in general, are creating is becoming harmful to the student and their future in the society. Dweck and Lukianoff and Haidt all have these ideas of mindsets and what they do to the developing mind. Whether it be running away from a problem like Dweck says or saying something triggers you like Lukainoff and Haidt say, they are both talking about mindset and how to overcome the fixed way of thinking.